Building brand equity: is there a recipe for media effectiveness?

The largest ever global media effectiveness study shows that campaigns could be 2.6 times more effective with a different media spend allocation.
15 July 2021
Lady looking at media
Jane Ostler
Jane
Ostler

Global Head of Media, Insights Division

Get in touch

Our brand equity thought leadership series has explored what brand equity is, why and how you should measure brand equity, and the role brand cues play in brand building. We now turn to the important contribution media effectiveness can play in building brands.

Media Reactions 2020 shows that advertisers are less confident than ever in getting the mix right between their online and offline media investments. The study showed that 51% of marketers say they are not confident they have the right media mix (up from 44% in 2019). Finding the right combination of media channels to optimise ROI and achieve brand objectives is a challenge, but examining Kantar’s CrossMedia database shows that there is clear guidance on which channel mixes work best for different brand objectives

Understanding media effectiveness

To uncover the recipe for the optimal media mix and to understand which channel synergies work in combination to meet specific brand objectives, Oxford University’s Saïd Business School conducted the largest ever academic study into media effectiveness based on an analysis of Kantar’s CrossMedia database. The analysis covered 1,105 multi-media campaigns (including paid, owned and earned media) with an average spend of $12m and a total spend of $13bn, across 557 brands and 51 different countries.

The focus of the analysis was to understand how successful advertisers are at building brands using their current media mix, based on four key brand metrics: awareness, association, consideration and motivation. The findings are intended to inform media strategies and help optimise media plans to improve ROI.

The composition of media channels used for each campaign was examined, and the effectiveness of those campaigns in achieving the brand metrics was assessed. Machine learning techniques including spectral clustering were used to group similar campaigns based on the channels chosen. Nine campaign typologies were identified based on the weight and the likelihood of each channel being used as part of the mix.

Nine media plan clusters

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Major channel(s)

TV

TV
Online Display

TV
Radio

TV
YouTube

Outdoor

TV
Outdoor

TV
Newspaper

TV
Facebook
Outdoor

TV
Facebook

Minor channel(s)

Online video

Outdoor

Outdoor

Facebook
Online display

Online display
Facebook

Outdoor

In eight out of the nine media plan clusters, TV is the dominant channel, used in combination with other major or minor channels. Major channels are those with a higher proportion of spend and minor channels a lesser proportion. Each of these nine clusters was then explored to understand their synergistic contribution to the brand objectives.

The analysis found that the average brand campaign could have been 2.6 times more effective with a different allocation of media spend.

It also identified that two-thirds of campaigns (65%) feature channels used in a dominant way (major channels), and supplementary channels (minor channels) are used in around 30% of campaigns.

There is no one recipe

The study concludes that no single media mix is best for all brand outcomes, and hence there is no single recipe for campaign success. However, there are some clear lessons on which channel mixes work best for specific brand objectives. For example, while heavy investment in TV and Newspaper are generally most effective in increasing awareness, TV, Facebook and Outdoor can better drive motivation.

The best performing media plans

Major channel(s)

Minor channel(s)

Awareness

TV / Newspapers

Outdoor

Association

TV / Facebook / Outdoor

Consideration

TV / YouTube

Facebook / Online display

Motivation

TV / Facebook / Outdoor

The key findings include:

  1. Campaigns that underdeliver often invest too heavily in one or two channels and should consider the synergistic effects of a better channel mix.
  2. TV advertising is still an effective bedrock for campaigns, but shouldn’t dominate investment.
  3. The combination of digital and offline channels is a powerful mix and should be considered carefully in line with campaign objectives.

The results show that brand owners are unlikely to achieve different outcomes using the same campaign or channel mix, so it’s back to basics: the main priority for marketers is to clearly identify campaign objectives and consider channel synergies at the start of the planning process.

Watch the Facebook Insights live webinar or read the White Paper to learn more about the findings.

This is the fourth in a series of articles that explore brand equity from different angles. Read the first three articles below and watch out for the next article that will uncover how to build brand equity.

About the analysis

Oxford University’s Saïd Business School analysed Kantar’s global CrossMedia dataset covering 1,105 multi-media campaigns from different categories. The campaigns had an average spend of $12m and a total spend of $13bn, across 557 brands and 51 different countries in every region.

Get in touch
Related solutions
Maximise return on your digital investments. Learn which campaign elements work best for your brand in different contexts.
Optimise your media mix across channels to deliver impactful campaigns and improve return on investment.
Analyse which paid, owned and earned touchpoints have the greatest brand impact, and how they work together, to optimise your media and marketing spend.
Media Reactions

Media Reactions

Discover which media brands and channels will provide the best environment for your ads to thrive.
Learn more