AI Is finally adding real marketing value but only when humans stay in charge

Technology
Jeff L Herrmann
Jeff Herrmann

VP, Global Client Director

Article

AI is increasingly integrated into marketing workflows, with its greatest value seen in predictive capabilities that enhance creative development and campaign effectiveness. However, human judgment remains essential to interpret and act on AI insights appropriately.

AI Is Finally Adding Real Marketing Value but Only When Humans Stay in Charge

There is no conversation that happens today without the mention of AI. Consumers are using it in their everyday lives, from search and discovery to dating advice and therapy. Marketers are using AI across nearly every part of the marketing workflow from strategy and content creation to personalization, analytics, and automation. But one area where brands are seeing the most value in AI is not in the scaling and speeding up of marketing processes, but in its ability to predict outcomes and act as a testing environment.

Across categories, predictive AI is proving itself a massive differentiator for brand performance, especially in creative development. But the technology is not without limitations. For marketers to get the most out of AI’s predictive capabilities, they need to treat it as evidence, not the final story.

Where Prediction Is Already Creating Commercial Impact

Marketers have known for years that creative quality is the single biggest driver of campaign impact, accounting for roughly 50% of advertising effectiveness. That’s why the most powerful use of AI today is in evaluating and predicting which creative elements are more likely to drive impact before spend hits the market. This allows teams to optimize early, reduce waste, and improve the probability of success.

Tools like Kantar’s LINK AI, validated at scale across thousands of ads, give marketers fast, directionally accurate predictions on creative quality. LINK AI leverages the world’s largest normative advertising database and has been independently validated by the Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB). The impact is real: improving an ad from “average” to “best” can increase ROI by 30% or more.

Brands are embracing it. Whalar, for example, partnered with Kantar to identify creator assets most likely to drive breakthrough and long-term brand equity, optimizing content for platforms like Instagram and TikTok using LINK AI’s predictive scoring.

Marketers would do well to remember that prediction is most valuable when it improves the inputs. It should not replace decision making. AI functions like a pre-flight check, identifying which creative elements drive persuasion, salience, and emotion, rather than an autopilot replacement for human strategy. AI is excellent at pattern recognition and probability. It’s less good at meaning.

Where Human Judgment Must Override the AI Model

AI is powerful, but it remains probabilistic, not deterministic. It cannot understand context, incentives, consequences, or emerging cultural meaning. It can’t see when the data is biased, outdated, or structurally flawed. It does not know when a “bad” score might still be a brilliant strategic risk. It also may miss cultural and contextual sensitivity that could create false or misdirected predictive signals.

AI can highlight patterns and probabilities, but humans are still the critical drivers on the final decision based on brand meaning, category nuance, and cultural timing.

Marketers must override the model when:

  • The recommendation conflicts with brand strategy
  • Data reflects existing behavior but not emerging demands
  • Short-term optimization gets in the way of long-term growth

In this way, AI is like an actor on a movie set, and its performance is dependent on the director, the script, and the context it is working with. That’s where people, emotional intelligence, and cultural nuance come into play.

Great organizations empower their teams to challenge the model, not defer to it. They want their teams to set the stage properly, ensure the inputs and “script” is based on the most solid material and high-quality data signals, and go through as many “takes” as necessary to get the best end result.

Why Predictive AI Struggles to Scale

When predictive AI fails, it is rarely due to inaccurate models. Rather, the reason it fails is due to a lack of organizational structures needed to translate predictions into action. Successful implementation of predictive insights requires an owner of action and a system for translation into media, creative, or portfolio decisions. Even high-quality AI outputs fail to influence decisions when they aren’t embedded into processes.

To avoid these pitfalls, leaders need to evolve organizational and individual mindset around trust, implementation and insight to action connectivity. Some teams over-trust model outputs simply because “the model said so,” while others reject them outright because they seem like opaque black boxes. And mindset limits impact when organizations treat prediction as a report to read rather than a signal that should trigger specific actions.

This is why AI-native systems outperform standalone tools. They integrate prediction directly into the decisions they’re meant to influence. Kantar’s approach, such as embedding LINK AI in creative testing, LIFT ROI in media optimization, and Trend AI in brand tracking, ensures insights flow into everyday operations rather than languishing in PowerPoint archives. Predictive AI scales when it becomes part of the workflow, not an afterthought. Brands leveraging these technologies need to have a clear understanding of how to utilize these insights and create iterative implementation systems.

The Future: Pairing Machine Intelligence with Human Accountability

Despite its speed and scale, AI does not eliminate uncertainty, rather it reframes it. Predictive systems surface multiple plausible futures, make trade-offs more visible, and sharpen the consequences of choice. This shift raises the bar for leadership. As prediction becomes cheaper and faster, judgment, courage, and context become more valuable. The most effective leaders are comfortable acting with incomplete information, using AI to widen their field of vision without surrendering accountability.

They understand that prediction does not absolve responsibility; it intensifies it.

The future belongs to organizations that pair machine intelligence with human accountability. AI is a tool. It is evidence. It is not the strategy, and it is not the story. Companies that recognize the distinction will move faster, make better decisions, and build stronger, more meaningful brands in a world increasingly shaped by algorithms.

Related solutions
Media Reactions 2024
Shape your media strategies to fuel brand growth
creative
Build stronger campaigns and supercharge the impact of your media investments
Get in touch
Want more like this?
AI and research
Until insights are put into practice, they are merely nice to know. Activation makes insights matter, and AI must be part and parcel of activation.​
A person wearing round, steampunk-style goggles stands covered in vibrant blue powder, with more powder exploding across their face and shoulders. The background is dark, making the swirling blue particles stand out dramatically. The person’s expression is calm and neutral as the pigment envelops them.
The most creative and effective advertising is likely to generate more than four times as much return on marketing investment profit. Can marketers really afford to take the risk of putting budget behind ineffective ads?
Rethinking AI-Generated advertising: how real people really react
Marketers everywhere are exploring how GenAI can help them scale ideas, customize content, and spark inspiration. But as AI becomes woven into every stage of the creative process, a new question emerges: How do people respond to AI-generated ads?